Everybody wants to be the author of a popular management tool. But at the end of the day, it’s useful to realize that many have a lot in common – what makes the difference, as with any tool – is the skill of the person using it and the consistency with which you stick with it.
Regrettably too few readers will have heard of Mary Parker Follett. I remember being blown away when reading her for my thesis. Back in the 30's, or perhaps a bit earlier, she wrote what you could read as a precursor to Giddens structuration theory ... amd so much more!
You are so right! So interesting how the male writers in those days kind of overwhelmed her message - but there is a lot of wisdom there. Thank you for the comment.
Disappointing read. Every type of tool often can meet multiple needs, and organizations needs change and evolve. I’m not surprised that some tools recycle better than others. So what is the point of this post? Reassurance or inspiration?
It was more to reflect on how and why certain tools are adopted and what the benefits and disappointments are. I'd say the point is to reflect on how some tools are faddish because they over promise, some are adopted because they work and some are so effective that they get to be part of the taken for granted framework we all live within. I'm doing another one next week on the evolution of theory relevant to tools - maybe you'll find that one to be more useful.
Regrettably too few readers will have heard of Mary Parker Follett. I remember being blown away when reading her for my thesis. Back in the 30's, or perhaps a bit earlier, she wrote what you could read as a precursor to Giddens structuration theory ... amd so much more!
You are so right! So interesting how the male writers in those days kind of overwhelmed her message - but there is a lot of wisdom there. Thank you for the comment.
Thanks for the common sense writings. Much appreciated.
Thank you for being a reader! I sometimes wonder if these land anywhere. Warmly, Rita
Rita, I read your posts and I like your “Corners” book. Keep up the good work.
Thank you Bill - that means a lot coming from someone with your experience!
Disappointing read. Every type of tool often can meet multiple needs, and organizations needs change and evolve. I’m not surprised that some tools recycle better than others. So what is the point of this post? Reassurance or inspiration?
It was more to reflect on how and why certain tools are adopted and what the benefits and disappointments are. I'd say the point is to reflect on how some tools are faddish because they over promise, some are adopted because they work and some are so effective that they get to be part of the taken for granted framework we all live within. I'm doing another one next week on the evolution of theory relevant to tools - maybe you'll find that one to be more useful.